On June 3, 2024, there was a meeting of representatives of groups providing educational programs of the second (master's) level of higher education, which are implemented at the Faculty of Social and Linguistic Communication: Practical Psychology, Secondary Education (English Language and Foreign Literature). Psychology, Secondary Education (History). Psychology, Secondary education (Ukrainian language and literature). Psychology.
In order to discuss the changes to the educational programs caused, in particular, by the participation of the GIIM in the Erasmus + project, guarantors of educational programs, stakeholders, representatives of the academic community were invited to a meeting initiated by the Department of Psychology of the GIIM: candidate of psychological sciences, associate professor, head of the psychology department of the GIIM Borozentseva T.V., doctor of historical sciences, professor, head of the department of domestic and foreign history of the GIIIM Dokashenko G.P., candidate of philological sciences, associate professor of the department of philology and translation of the GIIIM Yasinetska O.A., candidate of philological sciences, associate professor, head of the department of Ukrainian philology GIIIM Radionova T.M., candidate of historical sciences, associate professor of the Department of Ukrainian Philology GIIIM Muratova O.V.; candidate of psychological sciences, associate professor, head of the department of psychology of Melitopol State Pedagogical University named after Bohdan Khmelnytsky Prokofiev O.O. and candidate of psychological sciences, assistant professor of the department of psychology of Melitopol State Pedagogical University named after Bohdan Khmelnytskyi Ostopolets I.Yu.
Olesya Oleksiivna Prokofieva, as a member of the sectoral expert council 05 Behavioral and social sciences of the National Agency for Quality Assurance of Education, drew attention to the importance of clearly defining the purpose of the programs implemented at the faculty, matching the focus of the program with its content, the specifics of the professional direction of future specialists who are getting an education according to the selected program.
The advantages and disadvantages of broad universal training of future practical psychologists provided by current educational programs were discussed in the speeches of Tetyana Yartseva, a clinical psychologist of the mobile multidisciplinary team of the regional clinical psychiatric hospital of the city of Slovyansk, and Kateryna Zhurbylyuk, a second (master's) level graduate of higher education (group 505). .
We are sincerely grateful to all the participants of the meeting, in particular colleagues from Melitopol State Pedagogical University named after Bohdan Khmelnytskyi, for their constructive suggestions regarding the improvement of educational programs in order to successfully prepare applicants for productive professional activities.
